Call to Action
- Create Health Insurance tailored to the needs of a REALTOR®
- Provide you access to the same Health Insurance benefits currently enjoyed by employees of Labor Unions and Large Corporations
- Provide self-employed/contract workers with group rates on Health Insurance
- Make your insurance transferable, even when you change jobs
- Lower Health Insurance costs for REALTORS®
Background on NSBAR positions to local issues
NAR issues
October 21, 2005
Department proposes new advertising restrictions. The Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation has proposed an administrative rule under the Real Estate License Act that expands the rules regarding deceptive and misleading advertising. The proposed rule adds "advertising a property in a manner that creates a reasonable likelihood of confusion regarding the permitted use of the property" to the list of examples of "deceptive and misleading" advertising. The proposed rule then goes on to specify that any advertisement for a property zoned single-family that contains words or phrases suggesting multi-dwelling use, including but not limited to "apartment," "two units," "related living," "in-law arrangement," or "related apartment" shall be deemed to be deceptive and misleading advertising. The rule is apparently aimed at addressing complaints that the Department has received regarding the marketing of single-family dwellings as multi-family dwellings. The current license law and rules prohibit advertising which is actually deceptive and misleading and which can result in enforcement actions against licensees. IAR has expressed strong opposition to the Department regarding the proposal. As currently drafted, the rule would make it a license law violation to use the specified words or phrases, even if those words and phrases accurately and truthfully describe the legal use and nature of the property. The proposed rule raises serious First Amendment free speech issues and may have fair housing implications as well. An official public comment period commences upon the Department's filing of the proposed rule with the Secretary of State. IAR is in the process of preparing comments on behalf of our members, and we will share those comments with you when they are filed. The Department has the opportunity to revise the rules based on the comments it receives, and then the rulemaking will be reviewed by a legislative oversight committee (the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules, or JCAR). IAR is hopeful that favorable changes will be made to the proposed rules following the comment period. The Department may adopt a rule, with or without revisions, following the process outlined above, unless a super-majority of JCAR members vote to prohibit the rule as a threat to the public interest, safety, or welfare. The official publication date of the proposed rule will be November 4, 2005, and the earliest that the proposed rule could become effective is 90 days after that date. IAR will keep you apprised of developments on this important issue as they occur, and we will send out a “call to action” if and when it is appropriate. Please feel free to check the IAR Action Center at www.iaractioncenter.org for updates. Questions or comments to the IAR regarding this issue may be sent via e-mail to IARaccess@iar.org. To view the language in the proposed rule, link here to IAR Legal News. |
Tell the Feds Real Estate
is Competitive!
We need quality letters from Realtors around the country to drive
home our point that real estate is an extremely competitive business!
On Oct. 25, the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade
Commission are hosting a public workshop in Washington, D.C.,
entitled "Competition Policy and the Real Estate Industry." This is your chance to let federal regulators know your thoughts
on the competitive nature of the real estate
industry. NAR urges all members to take advantage of this opportunity
to submit comments, ideally before the workshop. NAR elected leaders
and staff are participating in the workshop to communicate NAR's
point of view.
Go online to access NAR's webpage that makes submitting a letter
easy with prewritten "sections" of letters that summarize
key issues to be discussed at the workshop. Letters that include
members' personal experiences with competitiveness in the industry
will be most effective. For more or to send a letter, Click
Here:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
July 20, 2005
For Further Information Contact:
Julie Sullivan, Greg St. Aubin
217/529-2600
REALTORS® Call for Illinois General Assembly to
Restrict Powers of Eminent Domain
Springfield, IL--On July 20th, the Illinois Association of REALTORS®
petitioned the Illinois General Assembly to enact state legislation
that strengthens Illinois law as it relates to local government
powers of eminent domain. Julie Sullivan, Assistant Director of
Governmental Affairs for the Illinois Association of REALTORS®,
testified today before the Illinois Senate State Government Committee
hearing held at the James R. Thompson Center in Chicago called
specifically to review eminent domain laws in response to the
recent U. S. Supreme Court decision of Kelo v. City of New London.
In the 5-4 decision rendered on June 23rd, the U. S. Supreme Court
ruled in Kelo v. City of New London, that the Fifth Amendment
to the United States Constitution does not prohibit a local city
government from using the power of eminent domain to take privately
owned property to promote economic development.
“We oppose the taking of private property for non-public
uses and oppose the widespread use of these extraordinary powers
given to governmental bodies,” said Sullivan, representing
the 55,000 REALTOR® member organization, in her testimony.
“The Illinois Association of REALTORS® clearly opposes
the taking of private property without just compensation, as directed
by the Fifth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution. We encourage
the acquisition of property by purchase on the open market rather
than by condemnation.”
In response to the hearing today, Illinois Association of REALTORS®
President John Veneris stated, “We strongly believe in the
right of individuals to own real property without the fear of
a government taking. Illinois law clearly is a patchwork right
now in regards to eminent domain and the spotlight that the Kelo
decision has placed on this issue gives us the opportunity to
clarify the law in Illinois. We oppose the widespread use of the
power of eminent domain and support clarifying and strengthening
Illinois state law regarding the issue.”
The Supreme Court in its majority decision in the Kelo decision
stated, “Nothing in our opinion precludes any State from
placing further restrictions on its exercise of the takings power.
Indeed, many States already impose ‘public use’ requirements
that are stricter than the federal baseline.” Some of these
requirements have been established by state constitutional law,
while others are provided by state eminent domain statutes that
limit the grounds upon which condemnations may be exercised. Property
owners in some states may be legally protected against the type
of eminent domain action at issue in the Kelo case.
“This is a historic opportunity for the Illinois General
Assembly to further strengthen and safeguard the rights of Illinois
citizens,” said Sullivan. “We believe that since eminent
domain impacts the constitutional rights of property
owners, it should be exercised carefully and only in special circumstances.”
House Bill 4091 has already been introduced that prohibits the
exercise of the power of eminent domain for private ownership
or control, including for economic development, unless it is specifically
and expressly authorized by law by the General Assembly.
The REALTORS® Association is calling upon the Illinois General
Assembly to adopt a general state statute that would uniformly
apply to all condemnation actions in the state and would further
strengthen and safeguard the rights of Illinois citizens.
The statute would include the following elements:
* A clearly defined term for “public use.”
*A prohibition of the condemnation of private property when any
of the property to be taken will ultimately be owned, leased to,
sold or developed under any other proprietary arrangement by a
private party; i.e. a non-governmental entity or person, unless
specifically and expressly authorized by a 3/5 vote of each chamber
of the Illinois General Assembly.
*Codification of the procedures adopted in the House for the use
of quick-take for all eminent domain actions.
*In determining whether a taking is for a public use, consider
the intended use of each parcel to be taken and not the project
as a whole.
*Require that the payment of “just compensation” as
directed by the Fifth Amendment, must cover the additional costs
incurred by property owners affected by condemnation actions above
and beyond the loss of the subject property.
“In light of the Kelo decision, we hope the Illinois General
Assembly stands ready to strengthen state law as it relates to
eminent domain,” said Veneris.
The Illinois Association of REALTORS® is a voluntary trade
association whose 55,000 members are engaged in all facets of
the real estate industry. In addition to serving the professional
needs of its members, the Illinois Association of REALTORS® works to protect the rights of private property owners in the
state by recommending and promoting legislation that safeguards
and advances the interest of real property ownership.
|
06.03.05 Ask your Congressional representative to keep banks out of real estate NOW, as a new legislative threat looms.
NAR President Al Mansell
is urging REALTORS® now more than ever to voice their support
for the Community Choice in Real Estate Act, H.R. 111. Association
executives are urged to encourage their members to respond to
this call in force.
In response to the recent introduction of a bill by Sen. Mike
Oxley, R-Ohio, that would specifically allow large national banking
conglomerates to own and operate real estate brokerages and management
companies, Mansell sent a Call for Action to all members to log
on to NAR's Action Center. At the Action Center, members can send
a new letter to their Congressional representative in support
of keeping banks out of real estate.
"The introduction of a bill to let banks enter real estate at this time shows the level of success REALTORS® are having in their advocacy efforts now," says Jerry Giovaniello, NAR chief lobbyist. "Clearly friends of the banking industry are concerned to see how much support REALTORS® are generating to keep competition in real estate strong by keeping out mega-companies whose interest is in making money off loans, not in providing objective representation to consumers in the most complex transaction of their lives."
Congress stood up and took notice when thousands of REALTORS® visited Capitol Hill in mid-May while they were in Washington, D.C., for the 2005 REALTORS® Midyear Legislative Meetings & Trade Expo.
Since the REALTORS®' visits, some 30 lawmakers in the U.S. House of Representatives have added their names as cosponsors of the Community Choice in Real Estate Act, to keep national banking conglomerates from entering real estate brokerage and management, according to NAR lobbyists. The House bill now has 223 cosponsors, a majority.
"This strong backing shows the unswerving support from members of Congress for keeping national banks out of the real estate business that has served as the backbone of our economy," says Mansell.
Make your voices heard! Send a strong message to your Member of
Congress: Act now and pass H.R. 111.
If passed, this bill would:
Please urge your membership to respond to this important REALTOR legislation.
If you have questions about the Call for Action, please call Rick Miller at 202-383-1107. If you have questions about the Small Business Health Fairness Act, please call Marcia Salkin at 202-383-1092.

